{"schemaVersion":"maha-epistemic/1.0","evidencePolicyVersion":"mps/0.1","recordId":"urn:maha:record:agentic-systems-mcp-mcp-tool-result-contracts","canonicalPath":"/knowledge/agentic-systems-mcp/comparisons/agentic-systems-mcp-mcp-tool-result-contracts","contentHash":"sha256:eefbbb278989ba0fd59a8478fbf442b96363f6a60a54796c044d22f1cb6fe266","generatedAt":"2026-08-25T09:35:39.763Z","publicationDecision":{"recordId":"urn:maha:record:agentic-systems-mcp-mcp-tool-result-contracts","publicEligible":true,"evaluatedAgainst":"maha-epistemic/1.0","reasons":[]},"claims":[{"id":"urn:maha:claim:agentic-systems-mcp-mcp-tool-result-contracts","scope":"Limited to Tool discovery, input schemas, calls, results, error handling, and security considerations. in “Model Context Protocol specification: Tools”; this candidate records the concept boundary and does not pool results from uncited systems or studies.","boundary":"MCP tool result contracts does not by itself establish system-level performance, safety, manufacturability, scalability, economic advantage, clinical benefit, or deployment readiness.","claimKind":"empirical-claim","sourceIds":["source-agentic-systems-mcp-mcp-tools"],"statement":"The cited source supports treating mcp tool result contracts as a distinct comparison within the stated agentic systems and mcp scope.","replication":{"asOfDate":"2026-08-24","assessment":"Independent replication and cross-platform transfer have not been compiled for this candidate; the evidence maturity refers only to the bounded source contract.","independentReplicationCount":null},"uncertainty":{"kind":"qualitative","statement":"No cross-source quantitative interval is asserted. Definitions, operating conditions, samples, instruments, and outcome measures must be checked against the exact cited locator during review."},"evidenceMaturity":"single-study"}],"sources":[{"id":"source-agentic-systems-mcp-mcp-tools","url":"https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/draft/server/tools","title":"Model Context Protocol specification: Tools","rights":{"note":"The candidate uses original boundary language and a short paraphrase linked to the cited source. No source passage, figure, or table is reproduced.","basis":"citation-with-paraphrase","quotationUsed":false},"authors":["Model Context Protocol contributors"],"boundary":"Protocol conformance does not establish that a tool is safe, correctly authorized, idempotent, or resistant to malicious inputs.","publisher":"Model Context Protocol","establishes":"The specification defines protocol roles and message contracts for discovering and invoking server-exposed tools.","identifiers":[{"value":"https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/draft/server/tools","scheme":"url"}],"publishedAt":"","exactLocator":"Tool discovery, input schemas, calls, results, error handling, and security considerations.","sourceChronology":{"status":"living-document","accessedAt":"2026-08-25","sourceVersion":"accessed-2026-08-25"}}],"reviewEvents":[{"scope":"source-fidelity","verdict":"approve","reviewId":"epireview_40a5b18cfbd341d4accf9283bb389826","rationale":"This internal editorial decision is limited to source-fidelity, exact target sha256:29e3e05e98eb67e9d0e6543b2bb7cbada7af1c622aaebdef0e4eb46e118ff631, and source report sha256:327b70e0c9462bf8b124fd513d9ce0b5248b69be59b972456d0255e04cb8dedf. It records protocol compliance, not scientific truth, independent validation, or expert consensus.","reviewedAt":"2026-08-25T09:34:37.424Z","reviewerId":"expert_maha-internal-editorial-v1","reviewMethod":"Deterministic exact-hash checks, public source-resolution evidence, source-to-claim audit, unsupported-inference audit, and AI-assisted internal editorial inspection. No external reviewer participated.","reviewerKind":"internal-editorial","reviewerRole":"AI-assisted internal source, scope, boundary, and rights audit; this is an organizational editorial method, not an external subject-matter credential or endorsement.","targetSha256":"sha256:29e3e05e98eb67e9d0e6543b2bb7cbada7af1c622aaebdef0e4eb46e118ff631","supersedesReviewId":null,"reviewerProfileVersion":1},{"scope":"domain-fidelity","verdict":"approve","reviewId":"epireview_f01cc7666bf944abb6db7f352b8c9c95","rationale":"This internal editorial decision is limited to domain-fidelity, exact target sha256:29e3e05e98eb67e9d0e6543b2bb7cbada7af1c622aaebdef0e4eb46e118ff631, and source report sha256:327b70e0c9462bf8b124fd513d9ce0b5248b69be59b972456d0255e04cb8dedf. It records protocol compliance, not scientific truth, independent validation, or expert consensus.","reviewedAt":"2026-08-25T09:34:37.495Z","reviewerId":"expert_maha-internal-editorial-v1","reviewMethod":"Deterministic exact-hash checks, public source-resolution evidence, source-to-claim audit, unsupported-inference audit, and AI-assisted internal editorial inspection. No external reviewer participated.","reviewerKind":"internal-editorial","reviewerRole":"AI-assisted internal source, scope, boundary, and rights audit; this is an organizational editorial method, not an external subject-matter credential or endorsement.","targetSha256":"sha256:29e3e05e98eb67e9d0e6543b2bb7cbada7af1c622aaebdef0e4eb46e118ff631","supersedesReviewId":null,"reviewerProfileVersion":1},{"scope":"boundary-adequacy","verdict":"approve","reviewId":"epireview_b8b233d8a2594a8598279d5a3aff34c6","rationale":"This internal editorial decision is limited to boundary-adequacy, exact target sha256:29e3e05e98eb67e9d0e6543b2bb7cbada7af1c622aaebdef0e4eb46e118ff631, and source report sha256:327b70e0c9462bf8b124fd513d9ce0b5248b69be59b972456d0255e04cb8dedf. It records protocol compliance, not scientific truth, independent validation, or expert consensus.","reviewedAt":"2026-08-25T09:34:37.574Z","reviewerId":"expert_maha-internal-editorial-v1","reviewMethod":"Deterministic exact-hash checks, public source-resolution evidence, source-to-claim audit, unsupported-inference audit, and AI-assisted internal editorial inspection. No external reviewer participated.","reviewerKind":"internal-editorial","reviewerRole":"AI-assisted internal source, scope, boundary, and rights audit; this is an organizational editorial method, not an external subject-matter credential or endorsement.","targetSha256":"sha256:29e3e05e98eb67e9d0e6543b2bb7cbada7af1c622aaebdef0e4eb46e118ff631","supersedesReviewId":null,"reviewerProfileVersion":1},{"scope":"rights-and-locator","verdict":"approve","reviewId":"epireview_86b156ad7cdb4319a3db24c22df5a244","rationale":"This internal editorial decision is limited to rights-and-locator, exact target sha256:29e3e05e98eb67e9d0e6543b2bb7cbada7af1c622aaebdef0e4eb46e118ff631, and source report sha256:327b70e0c9462bf8b124fd513d9ce0b5248b69be59b972456d0255e04cb8dedf. It records protocol compliance, not scientific truth, independent validation, or expert consensus.","reviewedAt":"2026-08-25T09:34:37.646Z","reviewerId":"expert_maha-internal-editorial-v1","reviewMethod":"Deterministic exact-hash checks, public source-resolution evidence, source-to-claim audit, unsupported-inference audit, and AI-assisted internal editorial inspection. No external reviewer participated.","reviewerKind":"internal-editorial","reviewerRole":"AI-assisted internal source, scope, boundary, and rights audit; this is an organizational editorial method, not an external subject-matter credential or endorsement.","targetSha256":"sha256:29e3e05e98eb67e9d0e6543b2bb7cbada7af1c622aaebdef0e4eb46e118ff631","supersedesReviewId":null,"reviewerProfileVersion":1}]}