{"schemaVersion":"maha-epistemic/1.0","evidencePolicyVersion":"mps/0.1","recordId":"urn:maha:record:agentic-systems-mcp-context-window-position-effects","canonicalPath":"/knowledge/agentic-systems-mcp/mechanisms/agentic-systems-mcp-context-window-position-effects","contentHash":"sha256:ae1e72566f66d8884a168f9511f03940d97ecc2449f28aa0995583d48e534a69","generatedAt":"2026-08-27T04:26:26.696Z","publicationDecision":{"recordId":"urn:maha:record:agentic-systems-mcp-context-window-position-effects","publicEligible":true,"evaluatedAgainst":"maha-epistemic/1.0","reasons":[]},"claims":[{"id":"urn:maha:claim:agentic-systems-mcp-context-window-position-effects","scope":"Limited to Long-context experiments, position effects, retrieval and question-answering tasks, and limitations. in “Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts”; this candidate records the concept boundary and does not pool results from uncited systems or studies.","boundary":"Context window position effects does not by itself establish system-level performance, safety, manufacturability, scalability, economic advantage, clinical benefit, or deployment readiness.","claimKind":"theoretical-model","sourceIds":["source-agentic-systems-mcp-lost-middle"],"statement":"The cited source supports treating context window position effects as a distinct mechanism within the stated agentic systems and mcp scope.","replication":{"asOfDate":"2026-08-24","assessment":"Independent replication and cross-platform transfer have not been compiled for this candidate; the evidence maturity refers only to the bounded source contract.","independentReplicationCount":null},"uncertainty":{"kind":"qualitative","statement":"No cross-source quantitative interval is asserted. Definitions, operating conditions, samples, instruments, and outcome measures must be checked against the exact cited locator during review."},"evidenceMaturity":"single-study"}],"sources":[{"id":"source-agentic-systems-mcp-lost-middle","url":"https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00638","title":"Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts","rights":{"note":"The candidate uses original boundary language and a short paraphrase linked to the cited source. No source passage, figure, or table is reproduced.","basis":"citation-with-paraphrase","quotationUsed":false},"authors":["Nelson F. Liu","Kevin Lin","John Hewitt","et al."],"boundary":"Benchmark position effects do not define a universal token limit or predict every model and workflow.","publisher":"Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics","establishes":"The study reports position-dependent performance on specified long-context tasks and models.","identifiers":[{"value":"10.1162/tacl_a_00638","scheme":"doi"}],"publishedAt":"2024-01-01","exactLocator":"Long-context experiments, position effects, retrieval and question-answering tasks, and limitations."}],"reviewEvents":[{"scope":"source-fidelity","verdict":"approve","reviewId":"epireview_d29954e6b2584d1da74666aa4a8ddf4f","rationale":"Lost in the Middle directly measures answer accuracy as relevant information moves through long contexts in multi-document QA and key-value retrieval. The record does not extend that result to every model, task, or context length. This approval is limited to source-fidelity, record urn:maha:record:agentic-systems-mcp-context-window-position-effects, and exact target sha256:d58c9eff543c9c2b592772bdaac5922c9c4c13460344a52551e9bd80c0b732fc; it is internal editorial review rather than external expert endorsement.","reviewedAt":"2026-08-27T04:26:19.247Z","reviewerId":"expert_maha-internal-editorial-v2","reviewMethod":"Record-specific exact-revision review against the inspected source location, bounded claim, non-claims, rights basis, and source identity. No external reviewer participated.","reviewerKind":"internal-editorial","reviewerRole":"AI-assisted internal source, scope, boundary, rights, and locator review. This is an organizational editorial method, not an external subject-matter credential.","targetSha256":"sha256:d58c9eff543c9c2b592772bdaac5922c9c4c13460344a52551e9bd80c0b732fc","supersedesReviewId":null,"reviewerProfileVersion":2},{"scope":"domain-fidelity","verdict":"approve","reviewId":"epireview_e5f9bde0d0864536aaf399506d84fb0a","rationale":"The record treats positional degradation as an agent/context-system constraint, retaining the paper’s task and model dependence rather than presenting it as a universal law of MCP systems. This approval is limited to domain-fidelity, record urn:maha:record:agentic-systems-mcp-context-window-position-effects, and exact target sha256:d58c9eff543c9c2b592772bdaac5922c9c4c13460344a52551e9bd80c0b732fc; it is internal editorial review rather than external expert endorsement.","reviewedAt":"2026-08-27T04:26:19.475Z","reviewerId":"expert_maha-internal-editorial-v2","reviewMethod":"Record-specific exact-revision review against the inspected source location, bounded claim, non-claims, rights basis, and source identity. No external reviewer participated.","reviewerKind":"internal-editorial","reviewerRole":"AI-assisted internal source, scope, boundary, rights, and locator review. This is an organizational editorial method, not an external subject-matter credential.","targetSha256":"sha256:d58c9eff543c9c2b592772bdaac5922c9c4c13460344a52551e9bd80c0b732fc","supersedesReviewId":null,"reviewerProfileVersion":2},{"scope":"boundary-adequacy","verdict":"approve","reviewId":"epireview_887d231abbd34284aa5eb5b0daf30bbd","rationale":"The limitations distinguish measured retrieval and QA behavior from general reasoning quality, production reliability, commercial readiness, or a guarantee that any placement strategy succeeds. This approval is limited to boundary-adequacy, record urn:maha:record:agentic-systems-mcp-context-window-position-effects, and exact target sha256:d58c9eff543c9c2b592772bdaac5922c9c4c13460344a52551e9bd80c0b732fc; it is internal editorial review rather than external expert endorsement.","reviewedAt":"2026-08-27T04:26:19.644Z","reviewerId":"expert_maha-internal-editorial-v2","reviewMethod":"Record-specific exact-revision review against the inspected source location, bounded claim, non-claims, rights basis, and source identity. No external reviewer participated.","reviewerKind":"internal-editorial","reviewerRole":"AI-assisted internal source, scope, boundary, rights, and locator review. This is an organizational editorial method, not an external subject-matter credential.","targetSha256":"sha256:d58c9eff543c9c2b592772bdaac5922c9c4c13460344a52551e9bd80c0b732fc","supersedesReviewId":null,"reviewerProfileVersion":2},{"scope":"rights-and-locator","verdict":"approve","reviewId":"epireview_345700af4c4944458a92afcf66acf01c","rationale":"The inspected artifact is identified as arXiv:2307.03172 with the abstract, multi-document QA, key-value retrieval, and position-effect results named as the locator; only original paraphrase is retained. This approval is limited to rights-and-locator, record urn:maha:record:agentic-systems-mcp-context-window-position-effects, and exact target sha256:d58c9eff543c9c2b592772bdaac5922c9c4c13460344a52551e9bd80c0b732fc; it is internal editorial review rather than external expert endorsement.","reviewedAt":"2026-08-27T04:26:19.863Z","reviewerId":"expert_maha-internal-editorial-v2","reviewMethod":"Record-specific exact-revision review against the inspected source location, bounded claim, non-claims, rights basis, and source identity. No external reviewer participated.","reviewerKind":"internal-editorial","reviewerRole":"AI-assisted internal source, scope, boundary, rights, and locator review. This is an organizational editorial method, not an external subject-matter credential.","targetSha256":"sha256:d58c9eff543c9c2b592772bdaac5922c9c4c13460344a52551e9bd80c0b732fc","supersedesReviewId":null,"reviewerProfileVersion":2}]}