{"schemaVersion":"maha-epistemic/1.0","evidencePolicyVersion":"mps/0.1","recordId":"urn:maha:record:mechanistic-interpretability-causal-scrubbing","canonicalPath":"/knowledge/mechanistic-interpretability/methods/mechanistic-interpretability-causal-scrubbing","contentHash":"sha256:4097a1b90c0c4e9908313d83025f6f229ef66fb4610c058164540d8363ef5cbe","generatedAt":"2026-08-27T04:26:30.659Z","publicationDecision":{"recordId":"urn:maha:record:mechanistic-interpretability-causal-scrubbing","publicEligible":true,"evaluatedAgainst":"maha-epistemic/1.0","reasons":[]},"claims":[{"id":"urn:maha:claim:mechanistic-interpretability-causal-scrubbing","scope":"Limited to Method definition, correspondence, resampling interventions, examples, and limitations. in “Causal Scrubbing: a method for rigorously testing interpretability hypotheses”; this candidate records the concept boundary and does not pool results from uncited systems or studies.","boundary":"Causal scrubbing does not by itself establish system-level performance, safety, manufacturability, scalability, economic advantage, clinical benefit, or deployment readiness.","claimKind":"theoretical-model","sourceIds":["source-mechanistic-interpretability-causal-scrubbing"],"statement":"The cited source supports treating causal scrubbing as a distinct method within the stated mechanistic interpretability scope.","replication":{"asOfDate":"2026-08-24","assessment":"Independent replication and cross-platform transfer have not been compiled for this candidate; the evidence maturity refers only to the bounded source contract.","independentReplicationCount":null},"uncertainty":{"kind":"qualitative","statement":"No cross-source quantitative interval is asserted. Definitions, operating conditions, samples, instruments, and outcome measures must be checked against the exact cited locator during review."},"evidenceMaturity":"single-study"}],"sources":[{"id":"source-mechanistic-interpretability-causal-scrubbing","url":"https://www.alignmentforum.org/posts/JvZhhzycHu2Yd57RN/causal-scrubbing-a-method-for-rigorously-testing","title":"Causal Scrubbing: a method for rigorously testing interpretability hypotheses","rights":{"note":"The candidate uses original boundary language and a short paraphrase linked to the cited source. No source passage, figure, or table is reproduced.","basis":"citation-with-paraphrase","quotationUsed":false},"authors":["Lawrence Chan","Adrià Garriga-Alonso","Nicholas Goldowsky-Dill","et al."],"boundary":"Passing a declared test does not prove the hypothesis is unique, complete, or semantically correct.","publisher":"Alignment Research Center","establishes":"The work proposes resampling-based tests for whether a hypothesized computational graph preserves behavior under declared interventions.","identifiers":[{"value":"https://www.alignmentforum.org/posts/JvZhhzycHu2Yd57RN/causal-scrubbing-a-method-for-rigorously-testing","scheme":"url"}],"publishedAt":"2022-12-06","exactLocator":"Method definition, correspondence, resampling interventions, examples, and limitations."}],"reviewEvents":[{"scope":"source-fidelity","verdict":"approve","reviewId":"epireview_0751539b999c4973a91c257e79d937b7","rationale":"The Causal Scrubbing article defines a mechanically derived test of an interpretability hypothesis using correspondences and resampling interventions. The record does not claim that passing such a test proves the hypothesis uniquely true. This approval is limited to source-fidelity, record urn:maha:record:mechanistic-interpretability-causal-scrubbing, and exact target sha256:8fd7d34fe31225012157eb78d84da4c9ffe9d0cad94226f7c27ba6ef83774949; it is internal editorial review rather than external expert endorsement.","reviewedAt":"2026-08-27T04:26:21.332Z","reviewerId":"expert_maha-internal-editorial-v2","reviewMethod":"Record-specific exact-revision review against the inspected source location, bounded claim, non-claims, rights basis, and source identity. No external reviewer participated.","reviewerKind":"internal-editorial","reviewerRole":"AI-assisted internal source, scope, boundary, rights, and locator review. This is an organizational editorial method, not an external subject-matter credential.","targetSha256":"sha256:8fd7d34fe31225012157eb78d84da4c9ffe9d0cad94226f7c27ba6ef83774949","supersedesReviewId":null,"reviewerProfileVersion":2},{"scope":"domain-fidelity","verdict":"approve","reviewId":"epireview_20e19187b3e54080bbd77d4a46afc2c3","rationale":"The method remains an interpretability-hypothesis test with declared interventions and examples; it is not transferred into a general causal-identification or model-safety guarantee. This approval is limited to domain-fidelity, record urn:maha:record:mechanistic-interpretability-causal-scrubbing, and exact target sha256:8fd7d34fe31225012157eb78d84da4c9ffe9d0cad94226f7c27ba6ef83774949; it is internal editorial review rather than external expert endorsement.","reviewedAt":"2026-08-27T04:26:21.468Z","reviewerId":"expert_maha-internal-editorial-v2","reviewMethod":"Record-specific exact-revision review against the inspected source location, bounded claim, non-claims, rights basis, and source identity. No external reviewer participated.","reviewerKind":"internal-editorial","reviewerRole":"AI-assisted internal source, scope, boundary, rights, and locator review. This is an organizational editorial method, not an external subject-matter credential.","targetSha256":"sha256:8fd7d34fe31225012157eb78d84da4c9ffe9d0cad94226f7c27ba6ef83774949","supersedesReviewId":null,"reviewerProfileVersion":2},{"scope":"boundary-adequacy","verdict":"approve","reviewId":"epireview_fd271253e06a4886888b4e94bb45c9a6","rationale":"The record carries the article’s method limitations and prohibits conclusions about complete model understanding, safety, robustness, deployment fitness, or exclusive causal explanation. This approval is limited to boundary-adequacy, record urn:maha:record:mechanistic-interpretability-causal-scrubbing, and exact target sha256:8fd7d34fe31225012157eb78d84da4c9ffe9d0cad94226f7c27ba6ef83774949; it is internal editorial review rather than external expert endorsement.","reviewedAt":"2026-08-27T04:26:21.613Z","reviewerId":"expert_maha-internal-editorial-v2","reviewMethod":"Record-specific exact-revision review against the inspected source location, bounded claim, non-claims, rights basis, and source identity. No external reviewer participated.","reviewerKind":"internal-editorial","reviewerRole":"AI-assisted internal source, scope, boundary, rights, and locator review. This is an organizational editorial method, not an external subject-matter credential.","targetSha256":"sha256:8fd7d34fe31225012157eb78d84da4c9ffe9d0cad94226f7c27ba6ef83774949","supersedesReviewId":null,"reviewerProfileVersion":2},{"scope":"rights-and-locator","verdict":"approve","reviewId":"epireview_8feca578c6184e66a500126c00b0dd83","rationale":"The author publication page and linked article were inspected at the method definition, correspondence, resampling intervention, examples, and limitations. Only source-linked original paraphrase is retained. This approval is limited to rights-and-locator, record urn:maha:record:mechanistic-interpretability-causal-scrubbing, and exact target sha256:8fd7d34fe31225012157eb78d84da4c9ffe9d0cad94226f7c27ba6ef83774949; it is internal editorial review rather than external expert endorsement.","reviewedAt":"2026-08-27T04:26:21.817Z","reviewerId":"expert_maha-internal-editorial-v2","reviewMethod":"Record-specific exact-revision review against the inspected source location, bounded claim, non-claims, rights basis, and source identity. No external reviewer participated.","reviewerKind":"internal-editorial","reviewerRole":"AI-assisted internal source, scope, boundary, rights, and locator review. This is an organizational editorial method, not an external subject-matter credential.","targetSha256":"sha256:8fd7d34fe31225012157eb78d84da4c9ffe9d0cad94226f7c27ba6ef83774949","supersedesReviewId":null,"reviewerProfileVersion":2}]}