{"schemaVersion":"maha-epistemic/1.0","evidencePolicyVersion":"mps/0.1","recordId":"urn:maha:record:interleaved-randomized-benchmarking","canonicalPath":"/knowledge/quantum-systems/methods/interleaved-randomized-benchmarking","contentHash":"sha256:7531a2a7479af7f9cf1061dc7e476308a1a0bfbd98dee9d3a15d3e62a4e156c2","generatedAt":"2026-08-30T16:02:22.708Z","publicationDecision":{"recordId":"urn:maha:record:interleaved-randomized-benchmarking","publicEligible":true,"evaluatedAgainst":"maha-epistemic/1.0","reasons":[]},"claims":[{"id":"urn:maha:claim:interleaved-randomized-benchmarking","scope":"The models, apparatus, protocols, datasets, and comparisons reported in Efficient Measurement of Quantum Gate Error by Interleaved Randomized Benchmarking.","boundary":"The result remains an estimator under assumptions and is not identical to application-level failure probability.","claimKind":"theoretical-model","sourceIds":["source-magesan-interleaved-rb-2012"],"statement":"The cited method derives bounds on a target gate’s error by comparing interleaved and reference sequence decays.","replication":{"asOfDate":"2026-08-24","assessment":"This candidate records one bounded source package. Independent replications and contradictory measurements must be compiled as separate records before maturity is upgraded.","independentReplicationCount":null},"uncertainty":{"kind":"qualitative","statement":"No platform-independent uncertainty interval exists; numerical values remain attached to the source experiment or model and its stated assumptions."},"evidenceMaturity":"single-study"}],"sources":[{"id":"source-magesan-interleaved-rb-2012","url":"https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.080505","title":"Efficient Measurement of Quantum Gate Error by Interleaved Randomized Benchmarking","rights":{"note":"Maha paraphrases the source-level result and links to the version of record; no article passage is reproduced.","basis":"citation-with-paraphrase","quotationUsed":false},"authors":["Easwar Magesan","Jay M. Gambetta","Joseph Emerson"],"boundary":"The estimate is protocol- and noise-model-dependent and does not replace workload-level or correlated-error characterization.","publisher":"Physical Review Letters, American Physical Society","establishes":"The paper proposes interleaving a target gate with randomized sequences to estimate that gate’s error subject to derived bounds and assumptions.","identifiers":[{"value":"10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.080505","scheme":"doi"}],"publishedAt":"2012-08-24","exactLocator":"Abstract; interleaved protocol; bounds; numerical analysis."}],"reviewEvents":[{"scope":"source-fidelity","verdict":"approve","reviewId":"epireview_974669c5968e429bbec372f1152ba5fb","rationale":"Interleaved randomized benchmarking binds claim urn:maha:claim:interleaved-randomized-benchmarking only to Efficient Measurement of Quantum Gate Error by Interleaved Randomized Benchmarking at Physical Review Letters version-of-record page, Abstract lines 89–91. The audit inspected version-of-record at declared inspected location depth and recorded subject and claim support; the claim remains limited to “The models, apparatus, protocols, datasets, and comparisons reported in Efficient Measurement of Quantum Gate Error by Interleaved Randomized Benchmarking.”. This decision applies only to record urn:maha:record:interleaved-randomized-benchmarking at sha256:b93a1312964e246b332b207d310fffe982efe0a1f0065cd9dae67df127266dd2 and does not certify truth, external endorsement, independent reproduction, or fitness for use.","reviewedAt":"2026-08-30T16:01:53.229Z","reviewerId":"expert_maha-internal-editorial-scale-v1","reviewMethod":"Each criterion is recomputed from the exact record, its inspected alignment audit, source identity, exact locator, rights basis, claim scope, boundary, uncertainty, replication status, prohibited inferences, and revision digest.","reviewerKind":"internal-editorial","reviewerRole":"AI-assisted record-specific review of inspected source identity, exact locator, bounded claim, uncertainty, non-claims, rights basis, and exact revision. This is not an external subject-matter credential.","targetSha256":"sha256:b93a1312964e246b332b207d310fffe982efe0a1f0065cd9dae67df127266dd2","supersedesReviewId":null,"reviewerProfileVersion":1},{"scope":"domain-fidelity","verdict":"approve","reviewId":"epireview_03551f0dd2f545ada4c3d025b5809c11","rationale":"Interleaved randomized benchmarking remains within domain quantum-systems. Its mechanism or method is the bounded proposition “The cited method derives bounds on a target gate’s error by comparing interleaved and reference sequence decays.”; the record does not transfer that proposition beyond The result remains an estimator under assumptions and is not identical to application-level failure probability. This decision applies only to record urn:maha:record:interleaved-randomized-benchmarking at sha256:b93a1312964e246b332b207d310fffe982efe0a1f0065cd9dae67df127266dd2 and does not certify truth, external endorsement, independent reproduction, or fitness for use.","reviewedAt":"2026-08-30T16:01:53.325Z","reviewerId":"expert_maha-internal-editorial-scale-v1","reviewMethod":"Each criterion is recomputed from the exact record, its inspected alignment audit, source identity, exact locator, rights basis, claim scope, boundary, uncertainty, replication status, prohibited inferences, and revision digest.","reviewerKind":"internal-editorial","reviewerRole":"AI-assisted record-specific review of inspected source identity, exact locator, bounded claim, uncertainty, non-claims, rights basis, and exact revision. This is not an external subject-matter credential.","targetSha256":"sha256:b93a1312964e246b332b207d310fffe982efe0a1f0065cd9dae67df127266dd2","supersedesReviewId":null,"reviewerProfileVersion":1},{"scope":"boundary-adequacy","verdict":"approve","reviewId":"epireview_2a8239cf2db84621a20999b1d7febac9","rationale":"Interleaved randomized benchmarking retains uncertainty “No platform-independent uncertainty interval exists; numerical values remain attached to the source experiment or model and its stated assumptions.” and replication assessment “This candidate records one bounded source package. Independent replications and contradictory measurements must be compiled as separate records before maturity is upgraded.”. Its non-claims and 2 prohibited inference(s) remain attached to every reuse. This decision applies only to record urn:maha:record:interleaved-randomized-benchmarking at sha256:b93a1312964e246b332b207d310fffe982efe0a1f0065cd9dae67df127266dd2 and does not certify truth, external endorsement, independent reproduction, or fitness for use.","reviewedAt":"2026-08-30T16:01:53.426Z","reviewerId":"expert_maha-internal-editorial-scale-v1","reviewMethod":"Each criterion is recomputed from the exact record, its inspected alignment audit, source identity, exact locator, rights basis, claim scope, boundary, uncertainty, replication status, prohibited inferences, and revision digest.","reviewerKind":"internal-editorial","reviewerRole":"AI-assisted record-specific review of inspected source identity, exact locator, bounded claim, uncertainty, non-claims, rights basis, and exact revision. This is not an external subject-matter credential.","targetSha256":"sha256:b93a1312964e246b332b207d310fffe982efe0a1f0065cd9dae67df127266dd2","supersedesReviewId":null,"reviewerProfileVersion":1},{"scope":"rights-and-locator","verdict":"approve","reviewId":"epireview_659a52e31c5944578dc2ce757b6c17d3","rationale":"Efficient Measurement of Quantum Gate Error by Interleaved Randomized Benchmarking is identified by doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.080505, inspected at Abstract; interleaved protocol; bounds; numerical analysis., and retained under citation-with-paraphrase. This approval binds only exact revision sha256:b93a1312964e246b332b207d310fffe982efe0a1f0065cd9dae67df127266dd2. This decision applies only to record urn:maha:record:interleaved-randomized-benchmarking at sha256:b93a1312964e246b332b207d310fffe982efe0a1f0065cd9dae67df127266dd2 and does not certify truth, external endorsement, independent reproduction, or fitness for use.","reviewedAt":"2026-08-30T16:01:53.529Z","reviewerId":"expert_maha-internal-editorial-scale-v1","reviewMethod":"Each criterion is recomputed from the exact record, its inspected alignment audit, source identity, exact locator, rights basis, claim scope, boundary, uncertainty, replication status, prohibited inferences, and revision digest.","reviewerKind":"internal-editorial","reviewerRole":"AI-assisted record-specific review of inspected source identity, exact locator, bounded claim, uncertainty, non-claims, rights basis, and exact revision. This is not an external subject-matter credential.","targetSha256":"sha256:b93a1312964e246b332b207d310fffe982efe0a1f0065cd9dae67df127266dd2","supersedesReviewId":null,"reviewerProfileVersion":1}]}