Compile fault-tolerant layouts from the geometry outward.

For quantum hardware architects, chief scientists, and quantum systems leads: turn a declared topology, code distance, and noise model into an inspectable holographic tensor-layout study.

Scope a compiler study →Read the research atlas ↗

A compiled graph is a design artifact. Logical error, throughput, and overhead require hardware-specific evidence.

Hardware-agnostic input

Superconducting circuits: grid connectivity and native-operation constraints.
Neutral atoms: reconfigurable-array adjacency and movement constraints.
Trapped ions: bus connectivity, zones, and measurement schedule.

Architecture comparison

A measurable alternative to qubit-count folklore.

Standard 2D Surface Codes

Planar local layout with substantial physical-qubit and routing demands.

Planning baselines can exceed 1,000 physical qubits per logical qubit at demanding targets.

Decoder and measurement-cycle latency are architecture-specific.

Maha Holographic QEC

Hyperbolic tensor layout synthesis mapped to a declared hardware graph.

3×–10× reduction is an explicit planning scenario, never a universal promise.

Compiler reports adjacency, routing, code geometry, and decoder assumptions.

A bounded compiler engagement

Start with topology, noise, and an acceptance test.

01 / Declare hardware graph, native gates, distance, error channel, and logical-qubit target.
02 / Compile candidate hyperbolic layouts and retain every boundary-mapping and routing record.
03 / Compare logical error, physical qubits, cycles, and decoder latency under the same assumptions.