An options library: these pages compare approaches without selecting one. Nothing here is an approved Maha position, a personal commitment, or a declaration of candidacy.

Corrections, review dates and position changes

Every draft has a revision date, stated evidence gaps and triggers for reconsideration. A newly inspected source does not automatically approve a policy choice. Substantive changes require another review and an explicit record of approval where a personal commitment is involved.

Existing published Maha proposals are attributed to their actual pages. New options remain under consideration. A philosophical claim in The Maha Principle or the Saturnian statecraft essays is not an approved legislative commitment or empirical finding.

Before publication, refresh time-sensitive claims, resolve legal and costing gaps appropriate to the page’s scope, obtain editorial and position approval, and separately authorize deployment. This project makes no claim that Mayone is a declared candidate or that the site is fully indexed.

Review and interests

AI-assisted source inspection and drafting; no independent expert, legal or budget review; no personal position approval.

Maha Strategies develops and offers evidence and AI-governance services. That commercial interest is relevant to its AI policy analysis; these briefs are not product endorsements or purchasing requirements.

v1 · 2026-09-19. All four methodology drafts require editorial approval.