frameworkDecisions and computation

Constraint satisfaction

Find assignments that satisfy explicit hard rules while distinguishing them from preferences and evidence weights.

Working definition

A constraint-satisfaction problem defines variables, domains, and constraints, then seeks assignments satisfying all hard constraints. Soft constraints and weighted preferences require a separate optimization or ranking layer so that exceptions and disagreements remain visible.

Notation

find x such that Cᵢ(x)=true for all hard constraintsxᵢ ∈ Dᵢ

Assumptions

  • Variables and domains are finite or searchable.
  • Hard and soft rules are distinguished.
  • Conflicts have a declared resolution policy.

Invariants

  • Every returned assignment satisfies all active hard constraints.
  • An unsatisfiable core identifies jointly conflicting constraints.
  • Removing constraints cannot reduce the feasible set.

Reproducible procedure

  • Compile rules into typed predicates.
  • Check consistency and extract conflicts.
  • Enumerate or optimize feasible assignments with a complete audit trail.

Error and boundary controls

  • Natural-language rules may be mistranscribed.
  • Incomplete constraints create false feasibility.
  • Search cutoffs can hide valid assignments.

What this does not establish

Faithfully satisfying traditional rules establishes internal consistency, not that those rules predict or cause the desired outcome.

Explicit applications

2 cross-domain bridges

Astrology traditionsformalization only

Rule conflict and satisfiability audit

Expose incompatible conditions, exceptions, and precedence policies across named traditions.

Inputs

  • typed rules
  • active chart facts
  • conflict policy

Outputs

  • applicable set
  • conflict set
  • resolution trace

Transformation: Evaluate hard predicates and extract unsatisfied or conflicting cores.

Limit: Logical consistency is not empirical confirmation.

Open connected system →
Pañcāṅga and timingformalization only

Muhūrta eligibility compiler

Find candidate windows satisfying a named tradition’s hard conditions while exposing withheld and conflicting rules.

Inputs

  • candidate intervals
  • tradition rule pack
  • activity type

Outputs

  • eligible windows
  • failed conditions
  • conflicts

Transformation: Evaluate typed predicates and compute feasible interval intersections.

Limit: Eligibility means conformity to encoded tradition, not demonstrated outcome improvement.

Open connected system →

Authoritative references

  1. [1]Dictionary of Algorithms and Data Structures · National Institute of Standards and Technology

    Establishes: Reference vocabulary for graphs, optimization, search, data structures, complexity, and computational methods used to make algorithms explicit.

    Boundary: A formal data structure can represent domain relationships without establishing that the represented causal or interpretive relationships are true.

Related mathematical concepts