Working definition
Translation is an accountable interpretation between languages, registers, genres, and cultural worlds. Because words rarely map one-to-one, the system preserves source wording, transliteration where useful, semantic alternatives, translator decisions, audience, and the downstream claims that depend on them.
Questions this method asks
- Which source edition was translated?
- What alternatives were available?
- Which claim changes if another rendering is chosen?
Evidence inputs
- Source and target passages
- Translator notes and glossaries
- Parallel translations and language expertise
Method
- Identify source witness and translation purpose.
- Annotate consequential terms and alternatives.
- Propagate translation uncertainty into downstream claims.
What it can establish
- Who translated what and how
- Where semantic choices affect interpretation
What it cannot establish
- Exact equivalence between languages
- That a familiar English term names the same category
Interpretive risks
- Erasing polysemy
- Treating inherited translations as neutral
Mathematical connection
Formal structure without validity transfer
Translation loss ledger
Track which distinctions are preserved, merged, introduced, or left unresolved across a translation.
Inputs
- Source terms
- Target renderings
- Annotated semantic distinctions
Outputs
- Preserved distinctions
- Collapsed distinctions
- Review requirements
Limit: Information-theoretic language is structural analogy here; it cannot quantify total meaning or rank languages and translations.
Methodology sources
- [1]Multilingualism and Linguistic Diversity · UNESCO
Establishes: A policy basis for treating languages as carriers of culturally situated knowledge and for preserving linguistic diversity, multilingual access, and participation in digital knowledge systems.
Boundary: Multilingual access does not make translations semantically identical. Every translation remains an accountable interpretation with choices, losses, gains, and a named source text.
- [2]TEI P5: Guidelines for Electronic Text Encoding and Interchange · Text Encoding Initiative Consortium
Establishes: A maintained scholarly standard for representing texts, manuscripts, witnesses, metadata, variants, editorial interventions, names, dates, and other features needed for inspectable digital editions.
Boundary: Encoding makes documentary structure and editorial decisions explicit; it does not decide which witness is original, which interpretation is correct, or whether the text’s theological claims are true.